The Bugle App
The Bugle App
Your local news hub
FeaturesLatest issueSportsPuzzlesWeekend Quiz24 Hour Defibrillator sitesSocial MediaKCR
The Bugle App

Fast-tracking state government’s plans amid housing and infrastructure turmoil

The Bugle App

Lynne Strong

27 June 2024, 12:34 AM

Fast-tracking state government’s plans amid housing and infrastructure turmoil

Opinion by Lynne Strong


Housing affordability and a lack of infrastructure have reached a crisis point in our community.


Yet, as property prices soar and our infrastructure crumbles, what are our leaders doing?


Sources reveal that the NSW government considers invoking State Significant Pathway Proposals to tackle these pressing issues.


These are mechanisms, which governments use to fast-track the approval process for critically important state developments.


They include large infrastructure projects, essential housing developments, and major commercial or industrial projects which will deliver economic, social, or environmental benefits.



These proposals are given priority in the planning and approval process, reducing the time taken to commence development. The state government often takes a more active role in overseeing and facilitating these projects to ensure they proceed.


Projects typically need to meet specific criteria to be classified as ‘state significant,’ such as the scale of the project, its potential economic impact, and its alignment with state strategic priorities.


While fast tracked, these projects are still subject to environmental assessments and public consultation, ensuring standards and regulations are followed.


They may stimulate economic growth by creating jobs, enhancing infrastructure, and attracting investment.


This pathway allows for the rapid development of critical infrastructure and housing to meet urgent community needs. By streamlining the approval process, resources are used more efficiently, reducing costs and delays associated with prolonged planning procedures.



If the government proceeds with State Significant Pathway Proposals, we could see rapid improvements in our infrastructure and an increase in affordable housing developments. 


But this approach is not without risks. Reduced public participation could mean that community voices are not heard, and fast-tracking projects might lead to insufficient environmental assessments.


To ensure that the implementation of these proposals benefits everyone, it is crucial for the community and our council to play an active role. We must demand transparency and accountability from our leaders and insist on thorough public consultation.


Doesn't everyone have a right to have a roof over their head and access to quality infrastructure? Imagine if our generation left that legacy. Let's engage with our candidates and hold them accountable for creating a liveable, inclusive and sustainable future for all.



Questions for Council candidates on State Significant Pathway Proposals:


  • What is your position on the use of State Significant Pathway Proposals to expedite essential developments in our area?


  • How will you ensure that these fast-tracked projects still meet environmental and community standards?


  • What criteria do you believe should be used to classify a project as state significant?


  • What specific measures will you implement to address the housing affordability crisis in our community?


  • How do you plan to ensure that new housing developments include affordable options for low- and middle-income families?